How Old To Get Into Winstar

Alsace


a week to decide the future of the city is very low, particularly if the values that distinguish the lists are barely legible.

Failing better, the left / right split seems to bounce back in the second round, with its plethora of party quarrels.
Another brand is emerging: the strong prioritizing certain leaders, relative to their list, as shown in their communication materials.
What will be the consequences of such an approach, which is reminiscent of certain abuses of the past? What place will be reserved for the confrontation of ideas, guaranteeing a wealth of proposals and a fair representation of all citizens?

The temptation of tactical voting would exacerbate the imbalance of the representation. The list
citizen wanted to stand out from these practices, starting first with the development of a program around core values, together with residents, and to elect a second time, the holder this project.

Building on its success in the first round, she wanted to boost his income while contributing to the success of the list labeled left. But the possibility of a merger between Succeeding Together Guebwiller List Citizen aborted in the bud. Some attribute this failure to the excessive 'greed' List of Citizen and accuse us of treason. To be clear, the Citizen List communicate the exact content of its proposal to you to assess: the merger of bringing together two lists into one, we proposed that it be composed of 25 members of Succeeding Together Guebwiller and 8 of Schedule Citizen placed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24. In addition, we wanted some assistant positions in proportion to our voices and provided that the union should win, finally to be involved in the campaign's second round. (Remember the 1st round: REG 23% SC 12%).
For information, Strasbourg Greens (6%) merged with the PS (44%) in strict compliance with the rules above. If it took less than a minute at the LC, to vote its 8 representatives to the merger, it seemed insurmountable REG retain only 25.
Has it forgotten that if the issue of such merger is to leave the majority in the second round, first and foremost to allow voters of the two lists have a high number of representatives in the future council?

So you who voted for us in the first round, decided to join us in the second or part of 40% of abstainers, give you the future of council representatives, vote for the Citizens List.